CTBUH and Penn Robotics: Robotics and the Culture of Making

Robotics occupies a critical nexus in the contemporary culture of making, where artistic exploration and architectural precision converge through increasingly sophisticated means. In the realm of art, robotics functions not merely as a medium but as a conceptual collaborator—an extension of the artist’s intellect and a vehicle for computational inquiry. This is exemplified in the University of Pennsylvania’s Deep Relief project, a permanent sculptural wall at the Middletown Free Library. Developed by the Autonomous Manufacturing Lab and Weitzman School of Design, the piece was generated through algorithmic modeling and fabricated using robotic milling technologies. Its intricate geometry and surface articulation reflect a fusion of human creativity with machine intelligence, demonstrating how robotic processes can articulate a spatial and perceptual complexity rooted in data and material agency (Miller et al., 2022).

By contrast, in construction, robotics has emerged as an indispensable tool for achieving levels of accuracy, speed, and formal precision that were previously inconceivable through manual labor. Robotic total stations, automated layout systems, and CNC fabrication tools now allow for the direct translation of digital design models into precise physical assemblies. Technologies such as Trimble's Robotic Total Station or Boston Dynamics' Spot integrated with BIM workflows exemplify how robotic automation is enabling millimeter-level tolerances, increasing site productivity while reducing human error and interpretative discrepancies (Bock, 2015; Khoshnevis, 2004). What was once the domain of artisanal interpretation has shifted toward cyber-physical execution governed by algorithms and spatial data.

These dual trajectories—robotics in the service of expressive form-making and in the pursuit of constructional exactitude—signal a broader epistemological shift in the culture of making. In art and design, the robot is not simply a tool but an intellectual actor in the creative process, opening new ontologies of form, performance, and material logic. In construction, it is an agent of optimization and control, redefining standards of precision and reproducibility. Together, these practices reflect the transition from intuitive, analog craftsmanship to digitally mediated authorship, wherein computation, automation, and robotic agency co-produce a new architectural and artistic intelligence (Carpo, 2011; Kolarevic, 2003).

If you require any accessibility accommodation, such as live captioning, audio description, or a sign language interpreter, please email news@design.upenn.edu. Please note, we require at least five (5) business days’ notice.